<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Uk Paper: Jacko Doc Admits He&#8217;s the Dad, Now Wants Custody</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dianedimond.net/uk-paper-jacko-doc-admits-hes-the-dad-now-wants-custody/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dianedimond.net/uk-paper-jacko-doc-admits-hes-the-dad-now-wants-custody/</link>
	<description>The official website of investigative reporter author and investigative reporter Diane Dimond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 10:48:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CLS</title>
		<link>http://dianedimond.net/uk-paper-jacko-doc-admits-hes-the-dad-now-wants-custody/comment-page-1/#comment-16517</link>
		<dc:creator>CLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dianedimond.net/?p=2112#comment-16517</guid>
		<description>Hilltophouse, if you take the forensic lab&#039;s report of the DNA of four different males found in semen samples and keep it within the context of the rest of the data on the countless legal documents, it does not prove Michael was gay. It supports the fact he was a pedophile. This includes the analysis of what was seized during the raid, by criminologists who specialize in child sexual abuse cases. I communicated with a criminologist from Southern California who read both the public and nonpublic documents. His opinion does not corroborate with yours. It does, however, corroborate with those I know who knew or dealt with Michael when he was alive. I think it&#039;s important to not sidestep the real issue, with speculation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hilltophouse, if you take the forensic lab&#8217;s report of the DNA of four different males found in semen samples and keep it within the context of the rest of the data on the countless legal documents, it does not prove Michael was gay. It supports the fact he was a pedophile. This includes the analysis of what was seized during the raid, by criminologists who specialize in child sexual abuse cases. I communicated with a criminologist from Southern California who read both the public and nonpublic documents. His opinion does not corroborate with yours. It does, however, corroborate with those I know who knew or dealt with Michael when he was alive. I think it&#8217;s important to not sidestep the real issue, with speculation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hilltophouse</title>
		<link>http://dianedimond.net/uk-paper-jacko-doc-admits-hes-the-dad-now-wants-custody/comment-page-1/#comment-12533</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilltophouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dianedimond.net/?p=2112#comment-12533</guid>
		<description>Quite so Sarah Richards.  You can see the 14 items deemed irrelevant on the &#039;desiree speaks&#039; excellent blogsite in all their glory.   The finding of 4 male dna&#039;s on mattress and sheets really proves that MJ was gay.  You can&#039;t argue with science.  As for item 14 the cocaine in the underpants - well your guess is as good as mine!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite so Sarah Richards.  You can see the 14 items deemed irrelevant on the &#8216;desiree speaks&#8217; excellent blogsite in all their glory.   The finding of 4 male dna&#8217;s on mattress and sheets really proves that MJ was gay.  You can&#8217;t argue with science.  As for item 14 the cocaine in the underpants &#8211; well your guess is as good as mine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Richards</title>
		<link>http://dianedimond.net/uk-paper-jacko-doc-admits-hes-the-dad-now-wants-custody/comment-page-1/#comment-12518</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dianedimond.net/?p=2112#comment-12518</guid>
		<description>You are so right Diane, I have recently come across some 2005 MJ trial documents on the net that speak of 14 items that the defence deemed irrelevant to the case and wanted banned from being mentioned in the court room, including the baby dangling situation, the cocaine in the underpants and the DNA of another found on MJ&#039;s mattress pad.  I an not sure if you have seen these docs however it states that their were 4 strains of DNA found: one being MJ&#039;s and 3 other male DNA strains, no female DNA at all.  If there was a way to tell the age of the owner of the DNA I think MJ would have been languishing in jail for 5 years by now!  It is a pity this information was not widely available before, it may stop the nutty MJ fans in their tracks when trying to convince the world that MJ was a normal hetero male!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are so right Diane, I have recently come across some 2005 MJ trial documents on the net that speak of 14 items that the defence deemed irrelevant to the case and wanted banned from being mentioned in the court room, including the baby dangling situation, the cocaine in the underpants and the DNA of another found on MJ&#8217;s mattress pad.  I an not sure if you have seen these docs however it states that their were 4 strains of DNA found: one being MJ&#8217;s and 3 other male DNA strains, no female DNA at all.  If there was a way to tell the age of the owner of the DNA I think MJ would have been languishing in jail for 5 years by now!  It is a pity this information was not widely available before, it may stop the nutty MJ fans in their tracks when trying to convince the world that MJ was a normal hetero male!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane</title>
		<link>http://dianedimond.net/uk-paper-jacko-doc-admits-hes-the-dad-now-wants-custody/comment-page-1/#comment-12463</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 21:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dianedimond.net/?p=2112#comment-12463</guid>
		<description>I only saw snippets of the interview - albeit long ones - on Entertainment Tonight.  The bottom line in my opinion?  Theirs was not a &quot;Normal&quot; marriage...by that I mean a husband and wife who live together, go to bed together, make love together on a regular basis.  Do I think she kept in contact with him after they officially separated?  yes, that&#039;s possible.  yes, I think its odd that only NOW does she decide to say positive things about him.  I think it speaks volumes about HER.

I continue to believe Michael Jackson preferred male/boy sexual companionship over female companionship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only saw snippets of the interview &#8211; albeit long ones &#8211; on Entertainment Tonight.  The bottom line in my opinion?  Theirs was not a &#8220;Normal&#8221; marriage&#8230;by that I mean a husband and wife who live together, go to bed together, make love together on a regular basis.  Do I think she kept in contact with him after they officially separated?  yes, that&#8217;s possible.  yes, I think its odd that only NOW does she decide to say positive things about him.  I think it speaks volumes about HER.</p>
<p>I continue to believe Michael Jackson preferred male/boy sexual companionship over female companionship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Richards</title>
		<link>http://dianedimond.net/uk-paper-jacko-doc-admits-hes-the-dad-now-wants-custody/comment-page-1/#comment-12457</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 05:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dianedimond.net/?p=2112#comment-12457</guid>
		<description>Diane, I am wondering after seeing the LMP interview with Oprah, what your take is on what she had to say.  Do you still believe your trustworthy sources?  I had always been of the opinion that the marriage was not commsumated and that LMP was dumped when she had served  her purpose.  In the interview she talks of how their marriage was normal and they continued their relationship for 4 years after their divorce.  There are infact pictures and videos on you tube of them in 1997 and 1998!  Do you believe it or do you think that it is all spin? It&#039;s odd that she waited until he was dead to say nice things about him, up until then she had been very umcomplimentary about MJ.  If they had continued their relationship after 1996, surely someone would have mentioned it, ie the various sources at Neverland, Bob Jones or one of MJ&#039;s loose lipped family members! Please let me know your thoughts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diane, I am wondering after seeing the LMP interview with Oprah, what your take is on what she had to say.  Do you still believe your trustworthy sources?  I had always been of the opinion that the marriage was not commsumated and that LMP was dumped when she had served  her purpose.  In the interview she talks of how their marriage was normal and they continued their relationship for 4 years after their divorce.  There are infact pictures and videos on you tube of them in 1997 and 1998!  Do you believe it or do you think that it is all spin? It&#8217;s odd that she waited until he was dead to say nice things about him, up until then she had been very umcomplimentary about MJ.  If they had continued their relationship after 1996, surely someone would have mentioned it, ie the various sources at Neverland, Bob Jones or one of MJ&#8217;s loose lipped family members! Please let me know your thoughts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

