<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Enigma That Was Michael Jackson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dianedimond.net/the-enigma-that-was-michael-jackson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dianedimond.net/the-enigma-that-was-michael-jackson/</link>
	<description>The official website of investigative reporter, author and voice-over artist Diane Dimond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:57:17 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Diane</title>
		<link>http://dianedimond.net/the-enigma-that-was-michael-jackson/comment-page-1/#comment-11583</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dianedimond.net/?p=2044#comment-11583</guid>
		<description>Ilina: 
Who knows how many Jackson fans would fit into your description as being &quot;hard-core&quot;?  I couldn&#039;t really say.  I get a lot of negative comments from Jackson supporters but I notice that many of the e-mails come from a handful of  the same IP addresses.  In other words, some people are writing me, pretending to be several different people, when in fact it&#039;s just one person behind much of the mail.  
As to Lisa Marie Presley.  It&#039;s my understanding that even her own mother couldn&#039;t figure out the WHY between that marriage.  Perhaps it had something to do with  LMP&#039;s ties to the Church of Scientology. Maybe it had something to do with her re-newed interest at the time to launch a music career. Maybe this daughter of the King of Rock &#039;n Roll really fell in love with the King of Pop.  Several sources, very close to LMP, have told me their union was never consummated.  LMP has never denied that. ~ DD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ilina:<br />
Who knows how many Jackson fans would fit into your description as being &#8220;hard-core&#8221;?  I couldn&#8217;t really say.  I get a lot of negative comments from Jackson supporters but I notice that many of the e-mails come from a handful of  the same IP addresses.  In other words, some people are writing me, pretending to be several different people, when in fact it&#8217;s just one person behind much of the mail.<br />
As to Lisa Marie Presley.  It&#8217;s my understanding that even her own mother couldn&#8217;t figure out the WHY between that marriage.  Perhaps it had something to do with  LMP&#8217;s ties to the Church of Scientology. Maybe it had something to do with her re-newed interest at the time to launch a music career. Maybe this daughter of the King of Rock &#8216;n Roll really fell in love with the King of Pop.  Several sources, very close to LMP, have told me their union was never consummated.  LMP has never denied that. ~ DD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ilina</title>
		<link>http://dianedimond.net/the-enigma-that-was-michael-jackson/comment-page-1/#comment-11581</link>
		<dc:creator>ilina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dianedimond.net/?p=2044#comment-11581</guid>
		<description>Hi Ms. Dimond,sorry for the bothering,I just wanted to ask you a few questions.
A while ago I participated on some MJ blogs and I must tell you I left pretty disturbed.Coming from medical backgraund I was making some points that there is 0% possibility that those are his kids biologicaly,that he was obviously a man in need of some serious professional help (probably 30 years ago before the world fame hit him in the head),that he was obviously having constant plastic surgery and somehow changed his skin colour onpurpose,that there is great posibility that he was having unproper relationships with those kids...It only backfired in a strange way,maybe some of the people are very young (teenagers maybe),however it is very disturbing to hear people so obsessed,that they have answer for everything and refuse to see at least something.I think that tells more about the human population and our state of mind than it tells about MJ.
So my question is what are the numbers of those hard-core fanathics worldwide from your point of view (of course not the exact numbers but some assumption from your part and from your experience).
The second question is for the other &quot;american royalty&quot;, Lisa Marie Presley.That marriage is very interesting (a lot more than the marriage with Rowe).We heard about her statement after MJ&#039;s death but still...She must knows something,what was behind that marriage,Scientology,musical career...?
Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ms. Dimond,sorry for the bothering,I just wanted to ask you a few questions.<br />
A while ago I participated on some MJ blogs and I must tell you I left pretty disturbed.Coming from medical backgraund I was making some points that there is 0% possibility that those are his kids biologicaly,that he was obviously a man in need of some serious professional help (probably 30 years ago before the world fame hit him in the head),that he was obviously having constant plastic surgery and somehow changed his skin colour onpurpose,that there is great posibility that he was having unproper relationships with those kids&#8230;It only backfired in a strange way,maybe some of the people are very young (teenagers maybe),however it is very disturbing to hear people so obsessed,that they have answer for everything and refuse to see at least something.I think that tells more about the human population and our state of mind than it tells about MJ.<br />
So my question is what are the numbers of those hard-core fanathics worldwide from your point of view (of course not the exact numbers but some assumption from your part and from your experience).<br />
The second question is for the other &#8220;american royalty&#8221;, Lisa Marie Presley.That marriage is very interesting (a lot more than the marriage with Rowe).We heard about her statement after MJ&#8217;s death but still&#8230;She must knows something,what was behind that marriage,Scientology,musical career&#8230;?<br />
Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DianeDimond</title>
		<link>http://dianedimond.net/the-enigma-that-was-michael-jackson/comment-page-1/#comment-8958</link>
		<dc:creator>DianeDimond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dianedimond.net/?p=2044#comment-8958</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe a word of it.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t believe a word of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maria tomlin</title>
		<link>http://dianedimond.net/the-enigma-that-was-michael-jackson/comment-page-1/#comment-8942</link>
		<dc:creator>maria tomlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dianedimond.net/?p=2044#comment-8942</guid>
		<description>Diane, 

                I saw a clip of youtube where Tom Mesereau spoke of having witnesses who stated that Jordan Chandler claimed that Michael Jackson never molested him. He further went on to state that Jordan told friends that he emancipated himself from his parents because they forced him to say these things. What is your opinion on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diane, </p>
<p>                I saw a clip of youtube where Tom Mesereau spoke of having witnesses who stated that Jordan Chandler claimed that Michael Jackson never molested him. He further went on to state that Jordan told friends that he emancipated himself from his parents because they forced him to say these things. What is your opinion on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DianeDimond</title>
		<link>http://dianedimond.net/the-enigma-that-was-michael-jackson/comment-page-1/#comment-8858</link>
		<dc:creator>DianeDimond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dianedimond.net/?p=2044#comment-8858</guid>
		<description>Eilowny-   
Jordie Chandler was apparently confused about whether Jackson was circumcised. However, what he described about discolorations on Jackson&#039;s penis was proven to be correct.    
In the opening chapter of my book I describe the day police went to serve a &quot;body search warrant&quot; on Mr. Jackson.  They were looking to see if the boy&#039;s description of Jackson&#039;s ERECT penis as having pinkish splotches on it were correct.  This was important to prove or disprove and they took along a police photographer to take pictures.  Jackson&#039;s attorneys had said that since Jordie and Jackson had gone swimming together (and changed clothes in front of each other) there could have been a perfectly innocent explanation as to how the boy could have seen and then described Jackson&#039;s genitalia.  However, Jordie was claiming to have seen the splotches on the side of Jackson&#039;s penis that was exposed only when he was in a sexually aroused state.  The photographs taken that day remain under lock and key in a bank safety deposit box in Santa Barbara, California. The Police and the District Attorney representatives there the day the search warrant photos were taken say Jordie&#039;s description was exactly right.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eilowny-<br />
Jordie Chandler was apparently confused about whether Jackson was circumcised. However, what he described about discolorations on Jackson&#039;s penis was proven to be correct.<br />
In the opening chapter of my book I describe the day police went to serve a &quot;body search warrant&quot; on Mr. Jackson.  They were looking to see if the boy&#039;s description of Jackson&#039;s ERECT penis as having pinkish splotches on it were correct.  This was important to prove or disprove and they took along a police photographer to take pictures.  Jackson&#039;s attorneys had said that since Jordie and Jackson had gone swimming together (and changed clothes in front of each other) there could have been a perfectly innocent explanation as to how the boy could have seen and then described Jackson&#039;s genitalia.  However, Jordie was claiming to have seen the splotches on the side of Jackson&#039;s penis that was exposed only when he was in a sexually aroused state.  The photographs taken that day remain under lock and key in a bank safety deposit box in Santa Barbara, California. The Police and the District Attorney representatives there the day the search warrant photos were taken say Jordie&#039;s description was exactly right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
