<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Diane Dimond &#187; sources on the Michael Jackson case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dianedimond.net/tag/sources-on-the-michael-jackson-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dianedimond.net</link>
	<description>The official website of investigative reporter author and investigative reporter Diane Dimond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:50:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Word About Sources &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://dianedimond.net/a-word-about-sources/</link>
		<comments>http://dianedimond.net/a-word-about-sources/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exclusives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diane Dimond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sources on the Michael Jackson case]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dianedimond.net/?p=2065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every investigative journalist must rely on confidential sources. Their inside information is the only way truth leaks out from government, institutions, corporations or celebrity entourages. And every good investigative journalist will tell you that what a single source says is never enough. You take the information from the source but then you must confirm it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dianedimond.net/a-word-about-sources/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

