Consumers of Media Beware!

by Diane on September 6, 2010

An Autopsy on the Media Coverage

I took some time off my regular schedule to write a book. It’s all about how we as a society have abrogated our opinion-making and handed it over to whatever media we follow.

For some people these days it takes too much time and effort to engage in critical thinking. But what if the media is just playing follow the leader – parroting each other and not really checking out the facts? It happens all the time and now more than ever we need to use our common sense to help lead us to the truth.

My new book is about the couple the media branded “The White House Gate Crashers,” Michaele and Tareq Salahi. The name of it is “Cirque Du Salahi – Be Careful Who You Trust” and I don’t mention it here as just a shameless plug for my own work. I mention is because Cirque – or circus – perfectly describes the information superhighway traveling into our homes every minute of every day. It has become a circus of truths, half-truthful exaggerations and downright lies.

Many of us gobble it up without stopping to think what we’re digesting.

Gate Crashers? Not!

Let’s analyze the nickname the press gave the Salahis just hours after they appeared at President Obama’s first state dinner on November 24, 2009: “The White House Gate Crashers.” But, whoa! Stop and think about that a minute.

Nobody “crashes” the gate at the White House, for goodness sakes! The place is ringed with armed guards and a massive security net. So why would the media say that – over and over before any real facts were known? Because it’s catchy and it fits into today’s terrorist watch mentality. Salahi – why it even sounds like a suspect Middle Eastern name!

The Salahis decided to open up to one person – me – and to tell their whole story. During my investigation I got to dissect all their e-mails with a White House representative who promised to try to get them in to the event. I discovered the Salahis honestly believed they were invited to the welcoming ceremony for the Prime Minister of India. I learned that once they arrived at the White House they presented their passports to not one – but two – Secret Service checkpoints and they were waved right in. Once inside the grand reception hall staff ushered them through the official receiving line and then into the lavish dinner tent set up on the South Lawn.

Now, what part of that sounds like a “gate crashing” to you? That’s right – none of it. Yet to this day most media continue to refer to the Salahis as “crashers” and remind the public that federal charges are still a possibility. Ridiculous.

The House Homeland Security Committee Vilifies Then Subpoenas Salahis

The Salahis immediately cooperated with federal investigators who learned the details I’ve just outlined for you – and much more. Yet those investigators apparently didn’t pass the word on to the Congressional Homeland Security Committee. Even before the hearing members publicly vilified the Salahis. Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee called them, “the perpetrators.” Her colleague, Eleanor Holmes Norton declared, “Clearly they were outlaws before they crashed the White House.” So when the couple was subpoenaed to appear before the committee there is there any wonder why they exercised their constitutional right to remain silent? With the deck already stacked against them they had no choice but to take their lawyer’s advice and plead the fifth. Your lawyer would tell you to do the same.

It was a shameful kangaroo court proceeding conducted by the Congressional panel that’s supposed to be concentrating on ways to keep the country safe in this post 9-11 atmosphere. Instead, the politicians were more interested in getting face time on TV while the story was still hot.

Salahis Supported Obama Back in 2005

The Salahis are not like you and me. Months before the White House event they were cast as members on a “reality” TV show. An odd move, in my book, but being odd is not against the law in America. They owe money to multiple creditors but how many other citizens have gotten caught up in this bad economy? Their worst luck was to become the target in this new era of lock-and-load journalism. The media decides who the focus is and relentlessly zero in.

The Salahis biggest transgression may have been that they blindly trusted too many people. Their own entertainment lawyer paved the way to the White House state dinner then dropped them like a bag of toxic waste after the scandal broke. They trusted federal investigators would help clear their name. They trusted that the justice system and the federal grand jury hearing their evidence would exonerate them. They trusted that the media would ultimately get the story straight. But here we are almost a year later and the Salahis are still twisting in the wind.

Too many of today’s professional journalists, augmented by mostly inexperienced internet bloggers, are all too eager to jump on the story-du-jour for fear of being left behind. Too bad they don’t take the time to research facts before parroting what others have reported before them.

Be careful who you trust.

{ 10 comments… read them below or add one }

Diane September 6, 2010 at 7:00 pm

ABQ Journal Reader Gunny Vetter writes:

“Found your Op-Ed letter on Crime and Justice interesting in the September 4 issue of the Albuquerque Journal.

It use to be that if a story appeared in print or was broadcasted Americans could depend that the facts had been checked out. Today that is not the case and probably why newspapers circulations are declining. I know of numerous people who have said they no longer read the paper or listen to the news because the stories are so slanted.
We can no longer depend on getting the facts from the news media because most of the stories are reported from the reporter’s view and beliefs, instead of just the facts and let us decide what we want to believe.

If reporters took the time to find the facts like you did, instead of trying to get a headliner, we may have a much better country to live in.

Hope you stay true to your word and continue to get the facts of stories and give people a chance to again have faith in what is being reported to us and let us decide what side we want to be on.”

Reply

Diane September 6, 2010 at 7:01 pm

Ms. Vetter:

I will try my best, I promise! ~ DD

Reply

Diane September 6, 2010 at 7:04 pm

ABQ Journal Reader William Delzell writes:

“Well, I actually agree with you on this one. The pundits and the politicians, indeed, did make a mountain out of a moll-hill by hounding the Salahis as if they had done something very horrible and dangerous to national security. To accuse the Sallahis of gate-crashing when they honestly believed that they were invited to a ceremony for India’s prime minister at the White House, was very uncalled for. You were right to call the proceedings against this couple a kangeroo court. They never were allowed to defend themselves The fact that they trusted too many people, including the entertainment lawyer who ditched them after the scandal broke was terrible. If fact, many people who are invitied to White House parties, like former Secretary of Defense Bob McNamera or former Secretary of State, Dean Acheson, were far more dangerous to the general public in their roles as architects of two pointless wars, Korea and Vietnam, which caused thousands of needless GI deaths along with equally needless deaths of Asian civilians and of their own soldiers.”

Reply

Diane September 6, 2010 at 11:40 pm

Facebook Friend Patrick McCall wrote:

“Today’s “journalists” follow the herd mentality to a conclusion they already have in mind and never let the facts get in the way of their predisposed opinions. I always disbelieve first reports of any “story.” Great insight, Diane.”

Reply

Diane September 6, 2010 at 11:41 pm

Facebook Friend Jackie Morin wrote:

“This is a naturally fascinating story that grows with it’s own momentum. You’ve done an outstanding job explaining it all & trust me when I say that I was an extremely hard sell. My question to you is….did you burn any bridges to bring this truth to the forefront?”

Reply

Diane September 6, 2010 at 11:42 pm

Jackie:

Oh yeah! I may never work in that town again (as they say!)

Reply

Diane September 6, 2010 at 11:44 pm

Facebook Friend Karen Van Vactor writes:

“Can’t wait for the book!”

Reply

Diane September 6, 2010 at 11:45 pm

Karen (and everyone)

The book is available for pre-order at Amazon.com . After the 15th of September 2010 you can always order the e-book or the hardcopy book via Amazon too.

Reply

Diane September 7, 2010 at 6:29 pm

Facebook (and Life) Friend Patti Petow writes:

“Maybe this book will get people to think twice before they believe everything they see and hear on the tube. … I also failed to mention that I totally agree with the point that Diane makes about bloggers and the lack of fact checking that can occur before stories post. By the time they get from one end of the “highway” to the other, it’s nearly impossible to separate fact from fiction.”

Reply

M. Jones September 8, 2010 at 11:40 pm

Although your theme applies well to other news stories of late, this is the case where the system actually worked. These people are extremely charismatic and believable, but if you track all the other incidents involving them in recent years, it becomes overwhelmingly clear that they are practiced liars. Either that or they have astonishingly bad luck in associating with person after person who ends up believing they are con artists.

The Washington Post got this one right. But, as I promised, I will read your book see what you have to say!

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: