Don't Slam Surrogacy - Slam the Lack of Laws[/caption]
It is not some science fiction movie plot. It is real. Human beings are being manufactured and sold – right here in America.
Even more shocking is the fact that decades after the first commercial U.S. sperm bank was opened (1971), after the world’s first test tube baby was born (1978), and after the first U.S. court case regarding surrogacy played out (1986), this country still has no uniform law regulating how surrogate babies are created in a lab and brought into the world.
Let’s be clear at the outset. No one wants to deny a childless couple the
[caption id="attachment_6514" align="alignright" width="120"]
Infertile Couples Have the Right to Parent[/caption]
right to have, raise and love a child. I cannot imagine the pain of an infertile couple longing to have a family. But at this late stage in the commercial surrogacy game there ought to be an agreed upon set of rules, regulations and laws on how it works - and what should be done when things don’t go as planned.
There are lots of cases on record of surrogacy arrangements that have gone terribly wrong.
In 1986, I was assigned to cover a New Jersey custody case which resulted in America’s first court ruling on the validity of surrogacy. The so-called “Baby M” case was fascinating! A married mother of two named Mary Beth Whitehead answered a newspaper ad and agreed to be the surrogate mother for two New Jersey doctors, William, a biochemist, and Elizabeth Stern. Elizabeth, a pediatrician, suffered from Multiple Sclerosis and worried about the health effects of pregnancy.
[caption id="attachment_6515" align="alignleft" width="120"]
Whitehead, Mother of 'Baby M' in Mid-80's[/caption]
Whitehead signed a contract and agreed to have the Stern’s baby for $10,000. A doctor inseminated Whitehead’s egg with William’s sperm and she became what is now called a “traditional surrogate”—one who has a biological connection to the baby. After the birth Whitehead could not bear to give up the child, named Melissa by the Sterns, and she and her family fled to Florida. Police found them and returned the baby to the Sterns. The stage was set for the precedent setting court case.
During the trial Whitehead was vilified. Mental health experts labeled her as suffering from “narcissistic personality disorder” and called into question her stability. Her attorney referred to Whitehead as an “exploited” woman. Ultimately, a Superior Court Judge ruled the surrogate contract was valid and in the “best interests of the child,” the baby should live with the Sterns. Whitehead was stripped of her parental rights and shut out of her daughter’s life.
[caption id="attachment_6517" align="alignright" width="120"]
Are Surrogate Contracts "Against Public Policy"?[/caption]
To underscore the legal vacuum surrounding surrogacy at the time, just ten months later the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that contracts to buy and sell babies went “against public policy” and should not be allowed. Whitehead’s parental rights were reestablished and she won visitation rights to the little girl nicknamed Sassy.
This legal limbo continues to exist today – nationwide – and at a time when the surrogacy market is “exploding” according to a report from the Council of Responsible Genetics. Many states have no surrogacy laws on the books. Some appear to permit such arrangements - New Mexico, New Jersey, Oregon, Virginia and Washington State, for example, allow uncompensated surrogacy. But many other states hold that any contract for a baby born for money is simply unenforceable. Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, Tennessee and Texas are the most surrogate-friendly states – as long as the buyers are a married couple.
To add to the confusion, surrogacy is no longer just about a willing woman being inseminated with the sperm of a known potential father. Advances in science have opened up all sorts of possible combinations – and potential for trouble.
[caption id="attachment_6521" align="alignleft" width="150"]
A Sister Gave Them Twin Babies - Then a Lawsuit[/caption]
Surrogates today can be the traditional kind, like Whitehead, or a “gestational surrogate mother” who agrees to carry the fertilized egg and sperm of two other people. She acts only as the host womb and has no genetic relation to the baby. You might think that this type of surrogate could cause no trouble after the birth.
Well, consider the case known by the initials, A.G.R. v. D.R.H & S.H. Again, it played out in New Jersey and came to court 20 years after the Baby M case. Two men – a legally married gay couple – decided to start a family. Lab technicians created an embryo for them using an anonymous donor ovum and the sperm from one of the husbands. The embryo was then implanted in the sister of the other husband. (You following this?) In 2006 the sister gave birth to twin girls and turned them over to the couple as stipulated in their surrogate contract.
A year later the sister was in court fighting for her parental rights – even though she had no biological connection to the babies! Having no law to guide them the New Jersey courts again disagreed with each other. At first, the sister was recognized as the girls’ legal mother. The trio continued fighting over the twins until December 2011 when a Superior Court decision awarded full custody to the husband who had donated the sperm.
[caption id="attachment_6522" align="alignright" width="120"]
Couples Deserve a Child - A Child Deserves a Happy Start[/caption]
Thank goodness the anonymous donor of the egg that split and created the twins never came forward to also claim paternity! You see how convoluted things can become when we mess with Mother Nature?
It is far past time for states to pass laws that create a clear cut, irrevocable path for participants in surrogate arrangements to follow. Failure to do that is an open invitation to more and very painful legal battles. It can also create lifelong scars for the child everyone professes to love.
{ 6 comments }















































BUY NORDIAZEPAM NO PRESCRIPTION
by Diane on September 3, 2012
[caption id="attachment_5596" align="alignleft" width="150" caption="Are You More Informed Now Than 4 Years Ago?"]
[/caption]
BUY NORDIAZEPAM NO PRESCRIPTION, You are being cheated– cheated out of important information the media should be bringing you but isn’t. Real brand NORDIAZEPAM online, To me, it’s a crime not only against you - the voters - but against the craft of journalism to which I’ve dedicated my life.
Understand that this is not a column touting either Republican or Democratic politicians, where to buy NORDIAZEPAM. NORDIAZEPAM brand name, This is about the reporters who cover those politicians for a living and what I see as their monumental failure to serve the public.
I've been there done that. During my career I've covered presidential campaigns and conventions, NORDIAZEPAM class, Generic NORDIAZEPAM, the U.S. Congress and the White House, japan, craiglist, ebay, overseas, paypal. While it has always been a game of reporters trying to coax real news out of calculating politicians and their strategists today's manipulation of the media - and reporters willingness to be used as conduits in the current trend of “politics of destruction” - is over the top bad.
[caption id="attachment_5598" align="alignright" width="120" caption="Record Jobless Rates, No Relief"]
[/caption]
At a time when the economy is sputtering, unemployment remains intolerably high, health care is unattainable for so many Americans and the future of young people seems so dim the media covering the presidential race concentrates on the mundane, BUY NORDIAZEPAM NO PRESCRIPTION. Where can i find NORDIAZEPAM online, Why. Because it’s easier than trying to clearly explain candidate’s solutions to looming problems like Medicare, australia, uk, us, usa, Buy cheap NORDIAZEPAM no rx, Social Security or the multiple-trillion dollar deficit. And let’s face it, NORDIAZEPAM maximum dosage, NORDIAZEPAM street price, those topics just aren’t as sexy as some of the “scandals” being laid in the media’s lap.
Party operatives (from both sides) spoon feed meaningless stories to reporters on the campaign trail hoping to sour voters on the opposition. These tantalizing tales are lapped up and regurgitated for the public under the guise of "news." I mean, where can i buy NORDIAZEPAM online, Buy NORDIAZEPAM without prescription, really, do you get up in the morning concerned that a freshman congressman from Kansas went skinny dipping in the Sea of Galilee last summer, cheap NORDIAZEPAM. BUY NORDIAZEPAM NO PRESCRIPTION, Or that a candidate drove around with his crated dog on the roof of the car during a family vacation nearly three decades ago. NORDIAZEPAM dosage, Of course you don’t because it doesn’t affect your life. But these insignificant stories continue to eat up countless minutes on television and fill column after column of newsprint.
[caption id="attachment_5599" align="alignleft" width="150" caption="Misguided Missouri Congressman Todd Akin"]
[/caption]
When one horribly mis-informed republican congressman makes a stupid crack about “legitimate rape” and how a woman's reproductive system can shut down during an attack, NORDIAZEPAM results, Buy NORDIAZEPAM from mexico, do you think his comments should taint every member of the GOP. How about when the democratic Vice President slips into a drawl and tells a predominately black audience that if the republican wins the White House he will, NORDIAZEPAM cost, Online NORDIAZEPAM without a prescription, “Unchain Wall Street (and) … They're going to put y'all back in chains." Should you think all democrats are class and race-baiters?
Gee, I learned in elementary school not to hold the words of one person against another, NORDIAZEPAM wiki. NORDIAZEPAM price, coupon, But political strategists, hoping to tap into the worst in human nature, buy NORDIAZEPAM from canada, Purchase NORDIAZEPAM for sale, have found a home for their ugly tales with undiscerning campaign reporters who with hypercritical fervor glom on to any and all controversies, preferring them to stories of substance, NORDIAZEPAM overnight. What’s worse is that when questioned, the straight-faced reporter defends the insipid stories as important for voters to know, BUY NORDIAZEPAM NO PRESCRIPTION. Buying NORDIAZEPAM online over the counter, Do they think we are that stupid?
[caption id="attachment_5600" align="alignright" width="120" caption="Political Reporters at White House Press Room"]
[/caption]
The New York Times, Reuters, buy NORDIAZEPAM no prescription, Is NORDIAZEPAM safe, Vanity Fair and the internet site The Huffington Post recently revealed they have engaged in the controversial policy of letting political strategists approve and tweak their own quotes before publication. And local reporters in swing states say they have had to agree to stay away from certain topics before being granted a coveted one-on-one interview with either President Obama or Mitt Romney, order NORDIAZEPAM online c.o.d. NORDIAZEPAM alternatives, Since when did reporters so openly agree to be used by the candidates. It’s journalism 101 to refuse to play such dishonest games, NORDIAZEPAM samples. It turns my stomach.
BUY NORDIAZEPAM NO PRESCRIPTION, [caption id="attachment_5604" align="alignleft" width="120" caption="Andrea Seabrook, ex-NPR"]
[/caption]
Some in the media are catching on and wising up. National Public Radio’s Capitol Hill reporter, Andrea Seabrook says that after 14 years on the beat she realized she was, “Actually sort of colluding with the politicians themselves.” Seabrook says couldn’t participate in the game anymore because she felt she was, “Lied to every day, all day.” So, she quit her job. I salute her bravery in standing up for ethical of journalism. So many reporters seem to have forgotten that we are supposed to report the truth and not simply parrot calculating politicians.
[caption id="attachment_5605" align="alignright" width="120" caption="Jake Tapper, ABC's White House Reporter"]
[/caption]
White House Correspondent Jake Tapper of ABC News hasn’t forgotten. He recently made a stunning public acknowledgement about this year’s political coverage saying, “The media is failing the country."MSNBC’s political analyst Mark Halprin, asked about Romney’s refusal to release any more tax returns declared, "The media are very susceptible to doing what the Obama campaign wants, which is to focus on this."
Again, I’m not here to pick a side or to even talk about media bias for one political party or the other. I’m here to say that at a crucial time in our nation’s history the media is cheating you out of meaningful information that could help you make a critical decision about who should be our next president.
This is a challenge to every news executive out there, BUY NORDIAZEPAM NO PRESCRIPTION. Stick to the stories that matter. Get your reporters back on track and refuse to be used in this obviously partisan political sport. This isn’t a game anymore. The future of the country depends on a clear, un-distracted focus on our monumental problems and who is best to help us back away from the cliff.
.
Similar posts: BUY NORPLANT-72 NO PRESCRIPTION. LEVAQUIN FOR SALE. BUY CELEXA NO PRESCRIPTION. Doses FRISIUM work. TESTOSTERONE ANADOIL class. Low dose PAXIL.
Trackbacks from: BUY NORDIAZEPAM NO PRESCRIPTION. BUY NORDIAZEPAM NO PRESCRIPTION. BUY NORDIAZEPAM NO PRESCRIPTION. NORDIAZEPAM pics. NORDIAZEPAM duration. NORDIAZEPAM from canadian pharmacy.
{ 17 comments }