Comments on: A Word About Sources …

By: Diane

Diane — Mon, 17 May 2010 03:17:20 +0000

Blythe,
Read my book. If you don’t want to buy it go check it out of the library for free – makes no difference to me. You’ll see I don’t tirade, I don’t insist you see my point of view because I don’t express a view. I tell you what I learned from very viable, confirm-able sources. I don’t reveal details of their stories because that would go to identify them and they don’t want the massive amount of attention that the Chandlers and/or the Arvizo’s got.
You have to decide for yourself who you “fawn” over and who you don’t. As for me? I don’t fawn over anyone.

By: blythe

blythe — Sat, 15 May 2010 05:30:41 +0000

again diane, you shouldnt have to reveal your sources ,but because mj was so secretive it’s like 6 of one and half a dozen of the other. who do you believe, any person can make statements as you and mj did and not be able to cooberate anything. at that point you have no choice but to go on the quality of that person meaning what he has done with his life and mj has done very good deeds and noone really knows about you except that they say you are an excellent reporter. you weigh the difference and you come out with a lot of angry mj fans. give us something to believe you with besides you word and maybe your point can be taken for what you feel it is worth. it is obvious you have a point you are trying very hard to have someone believe, why because no rational woman would continue this tirade against this celebrity unless you feel you are right. im trying my best as a mj fan to be objective and see the other side of the coin, and it is intriguing but i have nothing to go on. For instance , you say there are testamonials from other families who have been victimized yet you dont elaborate like maybe what happened or when. heck im begging you make me a believer i have kids and grandkids too. i certainly wouldnt want to be fawning over a person who is as dark as you say he is. anyway thanks for listening.

By: Diane

Diane — Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:18:08 +0000

Anything is possible, Sarah. It’s possible that the sun will not rise tomorrow morning – but I doubt it. I believe what I wrote in my book.

By: Sarah Richards

Sarah Richards — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:22:18 +0000

You know Diane I have read so much and chewed so much over in my mind about MJ. I believed that he was a child molester based on lots of different information that has been disseminated over the years, including your excellent book and his penchant for sharing his bed with little boys. Is it possible that we all made a mistake and that he was really innocent? There is still probably so much more that is untold, but is it possible that we were all wrong? Have we judged him too harshly? There seems to be so much conflicting info, he’s straight, he’s gay, he likes kids. What do we believe? In your heart of hearts what do you believe?

By: Diane

Diane — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:16:50 +0000

My reply is simple. Michael Jackson was a master at showing people only THAT side of him he wanted to reveal. I got the feeling that the body guards were heartfelt in what they said about Jackson. However, I came away unconvinced that they’d really been around him long enough to get to know the TOTAL man.