CYMBALTA FOR SALE

by Diane on February 21, 2013

Welcome to my home base where you'll find my weekly Creators Syndicate CYMBALTA FOR SALE,  crime and justice newspaper columns re-posted.  The paper of my childhood -- The Albuquerque Journal -- continues to be my column's showcase spot for as long as they'll have me.

My writings here are  always different.  Sometimes I'll simply tell you a story, cheap CYMBALTA. Online buying CYMBALTA, Sometimes I'll share my opinions, praise or criticism, CYMBALTA description. CYMBALTA over the counter, Other times I'll hold a mirror up to our society and invite you to form your own opinion. I hope the columns will give you something new to think about each time you visit, CYMBALTA from mexico. CYMBALTA natural, It’s a complicated world out there, full of situations of good versus evil, CYMBALTA maximum dosage, What is CYMBALTA, right versus wrong. My job is point them out, CYMBALTA from canadian pharmacy. CYMBALTA price, I'm also a contributing writer for Newsweek/The Daily Beast and you can find my articles at my homepage here.

Contact me here

Facebook: /Diane.Dimond
Twitter: @DiDimond
LinkedIn: /Diane Dimond. Buying CYMBALTA online over the counter. CYMBALTA results. Comprar en línea CYMBALTA, comprar CYMBALTA baratos. After CYMBALTA. Real brand CYMBALTA online. Where to buy CYMBALTA. Effects of CYMBALTA. Low dose CYMBALTA. CYMBALTA treatment. CYMBALTA reviews. CYMBALTA coupon. CYMBALTA cost. CYMBALTA overnight. Purchase CYMBALTA online. Canada, mexico, india. Is CYMBALTA safe. Buy cheap CYMBALTA. CYMBALTA photos. Buy generic CYMBALTA. CYMBALTA dangers.

Similar posts: CLOMID FOR SALE. BUY NORDIAZEPAM NO PRESCRIPTION. FLOMAX FOR SALE. CLOXAZOLAM brand name. Is ULTRAM safe. Purchase ERIMIN online no prescription.
Trackbacks from: CYMBALTA FOR SALE. CYMBALTA FOR SALE. CYMBALTA FOR SALE. CYMBALTA mg. Doses CYMBALTA work. Cheap CYMBALTA.

{ 15 comments }

  [caption id="attachment_6513" align="alignleft" width="150"] Don't Slam Surrogacy - Slam the Lack of Laws[/caption] It is not some science fiction movie plot. It is real. Human beings are being manufactured and sold – right here in America. Even more shocking is the fact that decades after the first commercial U.S. sperm bank was opened (1971), after the world’s first test tube baby was born (1978), and after the first U.S. court case regarding surrogacy played out (1986), this country still has no uniform law regulating how surrogate babies are created in a lab and brought into the world. Let’s be clear at the outset. No one wants to deny a childless couple the [caption id="attachment_6514" align="alignright" width="120"] Infertile Couples Have the Right to Parent[/caption] right to have, raise and love a child. I cannot imagine the pain of an infertile couple longing to have a family. But at this late stage in the commercial surrogacy game there ought to be an agreed upon set of rules, regulations and laws on how it works - and what should be done when things don’t go as planned. There are lots of cases on record of surrogacy arrangements that have gone terribly wrong. In 1986, I was assigned to cover a New Jersey custody case which resulted in America’s first court ruling on the validity of surrogacy. The so-called “Baby M” case was fascinating! A married mother of two named Mary Beth Whitehead answered a newspaper ad and agreed to be the surrogate mother for two New Jersey doctors, William, a biochemist, and Elizabeth Stern. Elizabeth, a pediatrician, suffered from Multiple Sclerosis and worried about the health effects of pregnancy. [caption id="attachment_6515" align="alignleft" width="120"] Whitehead, Mother of 'Baby M' in Mid-80's[/caption] Whitehead signed a contract and agreed to have the Stern’s baby for $10,000. A doctor inseminated Whitehead’s egg with William’s sperm and she became what is now called a “traditional surrogate”—one who has a biological connection to the baby. After the birth Whitehead could not bear to give up the child, named Melissa by the Sterns, and she and her family fled to Florida. Police found them and returned the baby to the Sterns. The stage was set for the precedent setting court case. During the trial Whitehead was vilified. Mental health experts labeled her as suffering from “narcissistic personality disorder” and called into question her stability. Her attorney referred to Whitehead as an “exploited” woman. Ultimately, a Superior Court Judge ruled the surrogate contract was valid and in the “best interests of the child,” the baby should live with the Sterns. Whitehead was stripped of her parental rights and shut out of her daughter’s life. [caption id="attachment_6517" align="alignright" width="120"] Are Surrogate Contracts "Against Public Policy"?[/caption] To underscore the legal vacuum surrounding surrogacy at the time, just ten months later the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that contracts to buy and sell babies went “against public policy” and should not be allowed. Whitehead’s parental rights were reestablished and she won visitation rights to the little girl nicknamed Sassy. This legal limbo continues to exist today – nationwide – and at a time when the surrogacy market is “exploding” according to a report from the Council of Responsible Genetics. Many states have no surrogacy laws on the books. Some appear to permit such arrangements - New Mexico, New Jersey, Oregon, Virginia and Washington State, for example, allow uncompensated surrogacy. But many other states hold that any contract for a baby born for money is simply unenforceable. Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, Tennessee and Texas are the most surrogate-friendly states – as long as the buyers are a married couple. To add to the confusion, surrogacy is no longer just about a willing woman being inseminated with the sperm of a known potential father. Advances in science have opened up all sorts of possible combinations – and potential for trouble. [caption id="attachment_6521" align="alignleft" width="150"] A Sister Gave Them Twin Babies - Then a Lawsuit[/caption] Surrogates today can be the traditional kind, like Whitehead, or a “gestational surrogate mother” who agrees to carry the fertilized egg and sperm of two other people. She acts only as the host womb and has no genetic relation to the baby. You might think that this type of surrogate could cause no trouble after the birth. Well, consider the case known by the initials, A.G.R. v. D.R.H & S.H. Again, it played out in New Jersey and came to court 20 years after the Baby M case. Two men – a legally married gay couple – decided to start a family. Lab technicians created an embryo for them using an anonymous donor ovum and the sperm from one of the husbands. The embryo was then implanted in the sister of the other husband. (You following this?) In 2006 the sister gave birth to twin girls and turned them over to the couple as stipulated in their surrogate contract. A year later the sister was in court fighting for her parental rights – even though she had no biological connection to the babies! Having no law to guide them the New Jersey courts again disagreed with each other. At first, the sister was recognized as the girls’ legal mother. The trio continued fighting over the twins until December 2011 when a Superior Court decision awarded full custody to the husband who had donated the sperm. [caption id="attachment_6522" align="alignright" width="120"] Couples Deserve a Child - A Child Deserves a Happy Start[/caption] Thank goodness the anonymous donor of the egg that split and created the twins never came forward to also claim paternity! You see how convoluted things can become when we mess with Mother Nature? It is far past time for states to pass laws that create a clear cut, irrevocable path for participants in surrogate arrangements to follow. Failure to do that is an open invitation to more and very painful legal battles. It can also create lifelong scars for the child everyone professes to love. home  

{ 5 comments }

A Spooky House, the Law and You

by Diane Dimond on June 10, 2013

  [caption id="attachment_6493" align="alignleft" width="120"] Got Ghosts?[/caption] Anyone out there live in a haunted house? It might seem like a silly question but as home sales pick up you should know there are laws against selling a house without full disclosure. A seller is required to reveal a number of things about their home. Like the condition of roof shingles or whether they have had issues with termites, persistent leaks or radon gas. Now, in a growing number of states the seller must also report suspected poltergeist problems. [caption id="attachment_6494" align="alignright" width="120"] Seen an Apparition in Your House?[/caption] Think you've seen ghosts in the hallway? Do objects in the home mysteriously move from place to place or have you seen furniture levitating off the floor? How about hearing odd and spooky noises in the dead of night? I know, who wants to admit to total strangers (let alone a real estate agent) that they think their house is haunted? But, there is case law on the books about the issue and if the buyer suddenly gets freaked out about spirit shenanigans in their newly purchased home they could decide to go to court to try to get their money back. The professionals in real estate call these houses, “stigmatized properties” and about half of all states have laws regulating their sales, according to the National Association of Realtors. The history of these places can include murders and suicides to people with certain diseases who died in the home. Worrisome histories can cause buyers to shy away for fear the place might be haunted. And the Association of Realtors says it happens more often than you’d think. [caption id="attachment_6495" align="alignleft" width="120"] Ackley House in Nyack, New York[/caption] The most documented case of buyer’s remorse occurred in 1990 in the village of Nyack, New York. Jeffrey and Patrice Stambovsky decided to buy a big, beautiful $650,000 Victorian home nestled near the Hudson River. They plunked down $32,500 as a deposit. Helen Ackley, the owner of the four bedroom, two bathroom property had decided to retire to Florida and when she put up the house for sale she failed to inform the buyers about her ghostly tenants. Neither did her real estate agent. [caption id="attachment_6499" align="alignright" width="120"] Helen Ackley Died in Fla. at Age 77[/caption] To be fair, Ackley had openly talked about the benevolent spirits who had occupied space with her family over the years. The information was out there. The elderly woman had described her ghost’s activities in detail – how they left gifts around the house, once helped her decide what color to paint a room and shook her bed each morning to awaken her – to the local newspaper. In fact Ackley’s story of poltergeists appeared three times in the paper between 1977 and 1989. She had also given a detailed interview for an article in Reader’s Digest. The home was even featured as part of a walking tour of “haunted houses” in Nyack. [caption id="attachment_6500" align="alignleft" width="120"] Nyack - Just 30 Miles North of Manhattan[/caption] After a local resident met the visiting Stambovskys and said, “Oh, you’re buying the haunted house?” the couple wanted to back out of the deal. They lived 30 miles south in New York City and had no knowledge of the folklore about the house. The couple did not appear at the signing, which meant they forfeited their down payment, but they were no longer obligated to buy the house. Mrs. Ackley, in no hurry to get to Florida, would not cancel the sale or return the buyer’s money so they all headed to court. The case took a while to resolve. The Stambovsky’s lost the first round after a lower court ruled it was their obligation to research the history of the home before committing to buy. But the New York Appellate Court ultimately ruled in the couple’s favor. The point of the story is, of course, is that it is far better to be upfront about suspected paranormal activity in your home than to keep it a secret. You could be tied up in court for years! [caption id="attachment_6501" align="alignright" width="120"] This Qualifies as 'Stigmatized Property'[/caption] Some states have a long list of stigmas that must be reported. They range from violent deaths, suicides and sex crimes to drug activity – specifically drug manufacturing at the location since the chemicals used could seep into the walls or foundation. In California, for example, a seller is bound to answer the buyer’s question about any deaths that occurred in the home. Illinois statutes state that since ghosts would not have an effect on the “physical condition” of the home they do not need to be disclosed. In New Jersey, on the other hand, real estate agents and sellers are specifically required to disclose, “Psychological impairments” inherent in a property – and yes, that includes the fact that it purports to be haunted. The same holds in Hawaii where the culture of spirituality and respect for the land require full paranormal disclosure. [caption id="attachment_6502" align="alignleft" width="109"] 37% of Americans Believe in Haunted Houses[/caption] In the last Gallup poll that asked the question “Do you believe that houses can be haunted?” 37% of Americans said yes. 32% agreed that spirits of dead people can come back in certain places and situations. So take heart, if you tell a potential buyer your place comes with unexplainable cold spots, creaky nighttime sounds, and floating apparitions you might not shock them at all. Some buyers are actively looking for just such properties. Back in the day the magician The Amazing Kreskin was interested in buying the Ackley house. But then a team of paranormal investigators reported that the ghosts inside the old Victorian told them it wasn't much fun haunting the house without Helen Ackley in it. Someone else bought it – fully aware of its controversial history – and there have been no more public reports of hauntings ever since. home  

{ 15 comments }

Time to Re-Think Laws on Teen Sex

by Diane Dimond on June 3, 2013

  [caption id="attachment_6449" align="alignleft" width="150"] Can Laws Really Regulate Teen Sex?[/caption] If an adult has sexual relations with a 14 year old that’s bad, right?  Okay, well what if that “adult” has just turned 18 years old and has a younger teen as a love interest? Would their actions be as serious a crime as, say, a 40 year old with a young teen?  The law says yes. The law calls it statutory rape when anyone who has reached adulthood has sex with a person under the age of 16. (In a few states it is age 15) It doesn’t matter if it is an older person is male or female or if the younger person is a girl or boy. It is illegal and often punishable by a hefty prison sentence.  The case that brings this issue to the forefront is playing out now in Sebastian, Florida. A person who just turned 18 engaged in a sexual relationship with a 14 year old that has been described as looking and acting much older than she really is. When the parents of the 14 year old found out they called the cops.  [caption id="attachment_6450" align="alignright" width="150"] Teens Are Sexually Attracted - Period[/caption] Surely this kind of attraction is happening in high schools across the country - a senior becomes attracted to someone in a lower grade and, well, both parties think they are in true love! It is normal teenage behavior to experiment with sex. It's one of those age-old rights of passage.  Nationwide attention has been focused on the Florida case, however, because the 18 year old is also female. And a pretty, petite female at that - a young woman who has been an honor-roll student, a cheerleader and active in school athletics. In other words, 18 year old Kaitlyn Hunt looks more like the pom-pom girl who dates the quarterback than someone who would have a same-sex affair. But she did. She has publicly admitted that she and the 14 year old girl twice engaged in sexual activity. Kaitlyn’s mom declares her daughter acted out of love for the younger teen.  [caption id="attachment_6455" align="alignleft" width="150"] Kaitlyn Hunt Just Turned 18[/caption] The parents of the 14 year old fail to see the Romeo-and-Juliet aspect of the situation and Kaitlyn faces two counts of lewd and lascivious battery of a minor which carries a penalty of up to 15 years in prison and a requirement that upon conviction she register as a sex offender. Kaitlyn was also expelled from the high school where both girls attended classes and the sexual activity took place. Kaitlyn’s future looks bleak.  "I'm scared of losing the rest of my life, not being able to go to college, and be around kids, and my sisters and my family," Kaitlyn told reporters recently.  She has every reason to feel that way. Colleges are unlikely to accept a student on the sex registry or one who has a felony conviction. Those listed on registry cannot be in a place where children are present, like a school, a private home or a place of employment where children might come in the door.  The prosecutor offered Kaitlyn a plea deal. If she agreed to plead guilty to a lesser charge of child abuse he would allow her to forego registering as a sex offender. The State Attorney said he would recommend to the judge that Kaitlyn be sentenced to two years of house arrest followed by one year of probation.  [caption id="attachment_6456" align="alignright" width="150"] For Kaitlyn - From Cheerleader to Convict?[/caption] Kaitlyn turned it down that plea. And whether her reason is because she truly thinks she didn't do anything wrong or she thinks public opinion (including support from gay rights groups) will sway the prosecutor or the other girl's family to drop the charges - the harsh reality is under the law she is guilty.  I hope the Hunt family truly understands what's at stake by refusing the plea deal. It is unlikely the prosecutor’s office will walk away from this high profile case because the law is so crystal clear. If Kaitlyn is found guilty at trial she faces the real possibility of years in prison. Trust me on this - prison is not a place you want your beautiful, blonde, apple-cheeked daughter to be.  What is it about the age of 18 that magically turns us into full-fledged adults with all the rights and burdens that the status implies? Nothing, really. The law had to draw a line somewhere and age 18 was chosen.  [caption id="attachment_6458" align="alignleft" width="120"] Turning 18 Changes Everything in the Eyes of the Law[/caption] In Georgia a few years ago, a 17 year old honor student named Genarlow Wilson was sentenced to 10 years in prison after he and his 15 year old girlfriend were videotaped at a New Year's Eve party engaging in what former President Bill Clinton has declared is an act that doesn't really constitute sex. An appeals court ultimately declared Genarlow’s sentence was "cruel and unusual" and he was released - but not before spending more than two years in prison. This is what our laws have wrought.  It really is time to give some serious thought to changing the laws on sexual contact between teenagers. I know the laws are designed to protect younger children from older kids who might be more aggressive in pressing forward with a sexual relationship. But when we try to legislate something as hard-to-control as the sexual urges of teenagers shouldn't there be some wiggle room? Say, consideration of extenuating circumstances like their scholastic achievements or their past contributions to the community? Do we really want to imprison a church-going, straight A student bound for college because he or she acted on a normal urge?  Mental health experts will certainly say it is not healthy to declare a young person's first sexual urges as "criminal" or somehow taboo - whether they are opposite sex or same sex attractions. The heart wants what the heart wants and no law can extinguish human desire. home  

{ 24 comments }

Americans in the Government’s Bull’s Eye

by Diane Dimond on May 27, 2013

  [caption id="attachment_6418" align="alignleft" width="150"] Outrage - But Enough to Force Change?[/caption]         Recent IRS and Freedom of Press scandals show that any of us could become victims of the government. Now is the time for outrage ~ Americans are being unfairly targeted by their own government. The proof is undeniable. It is clear that two of the nation’s biggest and most intimidating agencies – the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Justice have overstepped their bounds by trampling on citizens’ rights. We should all be outraged. You have to have been living in a cave not to have heard about the IRS scandal. The IRS’s Cincinnati office which approved tax exempt status for citizen’s political organizations deliberately singled out and harassed conservative Republican groups in advance of the last presidential election. Many of those who tried to legally establish groups with names that included the words, “Tea Party” or “Conservative” or “Patriot” were strung along and denied tax exempt status while the IRS quickly gave approval to groups from the other political spectrum. (Read that: the President’s Democratic Party) It has been reported that the IRS also targeted groups describing themselves as wanting to, “Make America a better place to live,” or criticized how the country is currently being run. [caption id="attachment_6419" align="alignright" width="150"] Were Politics Played Inside?[/caption] What if the IRS decided to target you because of your political affiliation, religion or sexual preference? That’s right – it would be outrageous and especially Kafkaesque for a country that was founded on equal rights for all. Was there a wink-and-a-nod mentality at play here? Was the inner-office goal at the IRS to give approval to the Democratic Party but not to the opposition? We aren’t getting any answers from the woman who ran that program. IRS honcho, Lois Lerner, has refused to testify to Congress about what happened under her watch. She asserted her Fifth Amendment right to stay silent. I wondered, if her employees were not acting on her instructions (or a command from higher up in the administration) why not just say so? [caption id="attachment_6420" align="alignleft" width="150"] Lerner Takes the Fifth - Says She Did Nothing Wrong[/caption] President Obama says he didn’t know anything about the “inexcusable” IRS actions that stalled his political opponents until he heard about it on TV the other day. He says the practice won’t be tolerated in the future – but that is a little late for those who wanted to make a difference in the last presidential election, isn’t it? Now we learn that news about the IRS scandal had reached the top level at the White House weeks ago and senior White House aides claim they kept it to themselves. If I had a staff that failed to warn me of a pending major event that could affect my standing– and I had to learn about it from the media - I’d be looking for a new staff. It is not just conservative, politically-minded citizens whose rights of free expression have been trampled by the government. It’s clear the Department of Justice has taken dead aim at those engaged in the business of a free press – the journalists that work to bring you, the public, the news you need to know about how your government works and doesn't work. [caption id="attachment_6421" align="alignright" width="150"] He Signed Off on Rosen Investigation[/caption] I know it’s fashionable to complain about the media but revelations about the Justice Department’s zeal to silence government insiders who leak information to journalists are astounding. Instead of concentrating on catching the leaker of information about a terror attack in Yemen the DOJ targeted the Associated Press. Investigators got a secret and wide-ranging subpoena for two months’ worth of phone records on office lines that were used by 100 AP reporters and editors in four different cities. The government also combed through AP journalists’ private phone records and e-mails. To me, this looks a lot more like a fishing expedition than a bona fide national security investigation. What if the feds scrutinized your personal records based solely on your occupation? Would that be okay with you? Certainly not. [caption id="attachment_6422" align="alignleft" width="150"] DOJ Sought to Criminalize Rosen's Work[/caption] And now comes word that the DOJ labeled James Rosen, a Fox News Washington-based reporter, as a possible “co-conspirator” in a criminal investigation because he “conspired” with an insider to get information about North Korea back in in 2009. What did he do? He gave a knowledgeable State Department employee his phone numbers and his e-mail and they devised a back door way to communicate via Google mail. Reporters are careful like that. It doesn’t make them a criminal. Even though they had plenty of evidence from the alleged leaker’s computer and office records federal investigators went ahead and scoured Rosen’s personal phones and emails as well as his comings-and-goings at the State Department. That the government would try to brand a trusted, working journalist who is gathering information for the public a “criminal” is beyond mere intimidation. (Full disclosure: Rosen is a former colleague of mine.) If there are truly damaging leaks of national security information from government insiders then by all means the DOJ should go after those employees. The leakers are the ones breaking the confidentiality rules of their employment, breaking the law in some cases. The reporter is simply doing his/her job to gather trustworthy information and report it. The U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment’s protection of press freedom should be sacrosanct. [caption id="attachment_6424" align="alignright" width="150"] Think of Sources Like Whistleblowers[/caption] It was a source that provided the initial information that broke open the Watergate scandal. Sources finally revealed the true story behind the terrorist attack on Americans in Benghazi and sources first revealed the so-called Fast and Furious “gun walking” scandal. When that well-established information pipeline is interrupted -- because a source fears his/her identity could be revealed through a government phone tap or e-mail sweep -- your right-to-know dries up. If the IRS can target certain citizens for harassment and reward others, if the Justice Department can put your sources for news in a bull’s eye and try to criminalize them – well, as I said: we should all be outraged. home    

{ 12 comments }

What’s Your Definition of a Pimp?

by Diane Dimond on May 19, 2013

 (See Update on this story at the end) [caption id="attachment_6345" align="alignleft" width="150"] Danielle Douglas, Former Sex Trafficking Victim[/caption] Danielle Douglas had a wonderful Mother’s Day – breakfast out, a trip to the zoo with her husband and two children, snuggly nap time and the gift of a colorful necklace and brooch. This New Jersey woman looks like a modern-day young mother. She works at a pharmaceutical company and in her spare time she experiments with fashion statements - different haircuts and color and fanciful makeup to accentuate her beautiful hazel eyes.But Danielle, 30, is far from typical. She is a survivor of human trafficking, victimized during her teen years by a vicious pimp who turned her out as a prostitute in the Boston area. Those violent years and how she survived is the subject of an upcoming documentary called, “10,000 Men” to be released later this year.  Today, Danielle is a woman with a mission. [caption id="attachment_6339" align="alignright" width="150"] Sex Slaves Are Held Nationwide[/caption] On the heels of news about the House of Horrors in Cleveland where three young women were held as sex slaves, Danielle is pushing for heightened awareness about how pervasive human sex trafficking is – nationwide. For Danielle words matter. “We have to start by changing the vocabulary that defines the crime,” she told me. And for her, “It all begins with the pimp.” For Danielle that was the man who conned her, imprisoned her in a home with other women, brought in streams of strange men and allowed her only a few supervised phone calls home to her worried family. He lived off her labor.  Recently, Danielle turned to a dictionary to look up the word “pimp” and was floored at the milk-toast, turn-of-the-century definition she found in her Merriam-Webster: “A man who solicits clients for a prostitute.” [caption id="attachment_6346" align="alignleft" width="150"] Up to Date Definitions? Afraid Not[/caption] “This is like a 1920’s definition!” she said. “Anyone who works with the problem of human trafficking knows that isn't even close to what a pimp is! … nothing about the violence they perpetrate and what they actually do to people,” she said with anger in her voice. “I decided, I've got to start a petition about this….we have to get real!”   Danielle’s on-line petition calls for Merriam-Webster to understand that, “Pimps use fear, force, and coercion to abduct human beings. They are usually violent and abusive, and can use various tactics to keep the human beings under their control.” She asks the dictionary keepers, “How can we expect people to understand sex trafficking when the definition of one of the main aspects is incorrect?”  My repeated messages to Merriam-Webster in Springfield, Massachusetts were ignored. But Danielle is a determined sort. She told me she finally got past the tape-recorded phone system and got a man in marketing on the phone. She calmly explained that she would like to discuss changing the definition of a word.  “He told me they only change definitions when they aren't current anymore. And (that) ‘We decide what needs changing.’” Danielle was told that the brainiacs at Merriam-Webster scour the internet to study current word usage and that is what determines whether changes are made.  [caption id="attachment_6347" align="alignright" width="120"] Human Trafficking is a Global Problem[/caption] Gee, a quick Google search and I was able to find pages of information about physically violent and mentally abusive pimps identified in scholarly human trafficking studies. It took me no time to learn about the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 which equates pimps to slave owners. Let’s not overlook the fact that many pimps sell defenseless children. On the Justice Department’s web site I found more than 115 recent entries by simply searching the words, “Sex trafficking + pimps + children.”  The folks at Merriam-Webster may not know the term “pimp” means a lot more than just, “A man who solicits clients for a prostitute,” but we know. So, let’s take up the education campaign where the dictionary has faltered.  Armed with the knowledge of what a pimp really is – a modern day slave owner of women and children – let’s all do our part to make sure another Cleveland-like situation isn't happening right under our noses. Exact victim numbers are impossible to know but a recent message from Congress estimates, “Every year as many as 17,500 people are trafficked into the U.S. from over 50 countries.” That doesn't even count missing or exploited American citizens.  [caption id="attachment_6348" align="alignleft" width="120"] Castro Held 3 as Sex Slaves for a Decade![/caption] Obviously, the Cleveland monster, Ariel Castro, 52, was not your run-of-the-mill pimp but his brutality toward women had been well documented in a string of domestic violence complaints dating back to 1989. In 2004, police went to his home after he was accused of mistreating a child on his school bus but no one answered and police never tried to speak to him at the house again. More recently, when neighbors say they called in a report of seeing a naked woman chained in his backyard Castro should have already been on law enforcement’s radar even though none of the numerous complaints against him ever wound up in court.  Things won’t get better until we all get involved. Neighbors? Make it your business to know what’s going on at that spooky house down the block. Call police with your suspicions because there is no telling what – or who – they might find behind those blacked out windows. Call more than once if you have to.   To law enforcement I say: More awareness training, please, so officers don’t just stop-and-knock but actually ask to come inside for a routine welfare check – in all rooms of the house. And to politicians: How about some tougher anti-pimp laws to insure it isn’t just the prostitute that gets arrested? And while I've got your attention – why not sign Danielle’s petition? Words matter and true definitions enlighten.  home  UPDATE: On May 23, 2013 Danielle Douglas became victorious!  Merriam-Webster wrote to Danielle and declared, "Thank you for your message regarding the definition of "pimp." We agree that the current definition is in need of updating and are researching the matter further. We expect the definition to be changed when the dictionary is next revised. Thank you again for helping to bring this matter to our attention.
Merriam-Webster Editorial Department" Who says you can't fight City Hall? My suggestion to Merriam-Webster is:  why wait to provide to become current in the next revised publication? How's about changing the definition of "pimp" right now in the on-line dictionary?  ~ DD

{ 10 comments }

[caption id="attachment_6320" align="alignleft" width="120"] Does Dept Make You Feel Secure?[/caption] I've been doing a lot of thinking about our Department of Homeland Security lately. The DHS was formed after the September 11, 2001 attacks, of course, but since then it has grown to mammoth proportions. It now has more than 200,000 employees and it is the nation’s third largest Cabinet department after the Defense Department and Veterans Affairs. The taxpayer’s bill for DHS is also enormous. If all goes as planned you and I will send $59 billion more of our hard earned dollars to the DHS this year to advance their mission to, “prevent attacks and protect Americans – on the land, in the sea and in the air.” Here we are more than a dozen years after 9-11 – and hundreds of billions of dollars later – and we still have no foolproof way to sift through our own suspected terrorist watch list. It’s called the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment or TIDE and it current holds a whopping 700,000 suspect’s names. Something as simple as a misspelled name can gum up the works and render the list next to useless. [caption id="attachment_6322" align="alignright" width="120"] America Welcomed His Family - He Became Terrorist[/caption] After Russian and Saudi intelligence agents labeled Boston bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev, a “follower of radical Islam,” and warned us in 2011 to keep an eye on him, neither the FBI or the CIA found any evidence that he was connected to extremist Muslim groups. Nonetheless Tsarnaev’s name was entered onto the TIDE list but, yes, you guessed it – his last name was misspelled. The list should have spit out Tsarnaev’s name when he traveled from Massachusetts to Chechnya and Dagestan (known terrorist training grounds) in 2012 but it didn't  Tsarnaev stayed in Russia for six full months and then returned to the United States unhampered and apparently un-watched. It was during that trip, American intelligence believes, the older Tsarnaev brother became radicalized and programmed to do harm to as many Americans as possible. Tsarnaev’s dramatically accusatory mother back in Dagestan (she left the Boston area after being charged with shoplifting) has claimed the FBI hounded her son for five years. If that really happened don’t you think the FBI would have discovered the Tsarnaev brothers’ bomb plot and acted to stop it? [caption id="attachment_6323" align="alignleft" width="120"] The Devoted Mother of Terrorists[/caption] On the other hand, there seems to be so many holes in our national security safety net I don’t know what to think anymore. I’m still unclear as to which agency was actually supposed to watch Tsarnaev. The FBI? DHS? Immigration or some other far-flung governmental body? I have worked with countless devoted and tireless agents of the FBI, Secret Service, U.S. Customs and state and local police departments across the country. I hate to cast aspersions on any law enforcement agency’s dedicated work keeping us safe. But it is clear more than a decade after 9-11 the U.S. infra- structure needed to ferret out possible terrorists is still blatantly lacking in major ways. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano was recently forced to admit a major deficiency. She revealed we still don’t have a trustworthy, computerized system to figure out which foreign students are in the country legally or on expired student visas. Unbelievable! [caption id="attachment_6324" align="alignright" width="120"] Is She the Right Leader for DHS?[/caption] That student visa lapse allowed a young man from Kazakhstan to recently re-enter the United States and head back to Boston even though he wasn't enrolled in school anymore. That person is now charged with trying to help the younger Dzhokhar Tsarnaev cover up his Boston Marathon bombing crimes by removing evidence from his dorm room. Napolitano confirms that since the tragedy in Boston U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents have been laboriously checking student visa files – by hand – to identify which are still valid and those that are not. Maybe, Napolitano says, we’ll have an automated system by the end of this month. Really? Between September 11, 2001 and now no one thought it was important to keep computerized and organized tabs on foreign student visas? It’s clear we need to shake up the organization of all our domestic protection efforts to come up with a mandatory and cooperative framework that assures all our government agencies work together and are more responsive to today’s security needs. [caption id="attachment_6326" align="alignleft" width="150"] Made at Home Plastic Guns - And They Work[/caption] Now comes word of a new threat that seems to have caught authorities by surprise. While the national debate was focused on new gun control laws there was a unique kind of gun being added to the American arsenal – plastic guns produced by relatively inexpensive 3-D printers. These new printers do have positive applications. They can produce low cost medical, automotive and toy parts. Gun makers simply load the printers with sheets of thick plastic and program them to follow a computerized blueprint. Plastic gun parts are then formed and snapped together and loaded with traditional ammunition they are just as deadly as any other firearm. There is one small piece of metal included, designed to meet some obscure federal law on guns, but this new breed of weapon is thought to be mostly undetectable. That means our traditional screening procedures at airports, schools and government buildings could be useless. I don’t know if Homeland Security should have been on top of this new invention. Maybe it’s the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives or the FBI or any other number of government agencies. I do know that our law enforcement agencies don't always share intelligence - Boston PD, for example, never knew the FBI looked at the older Tsarnaev brother as a potential terrorist.  As terror and crime continue to morph into various and scary forms it is imperative that our bloated and disorganized government agencies get it together! Lives depend on it. home  

{ 7 comments }

Moving? Beware the Con!

by Diane Dimond on May 6, 2013

[caption id="attachment_6290" align="alignleft" width="150"] We're On The Move![/caption] Hey, have you heard? The economy is improving! Car sales are up, so are new construction permits and the housing market seems to have righted itself. According to folks who keep track of these things at the American Moving & Storage Association a record number of us are expected to move residences this year, migrating to bigger apartments, houses or new jobs out of state. The Census Bureau reports that last year 36.5 million Americans changed where they lived. (They count every man, woman and child over 1 year old.) So, imagine the economic impact of close to 40 million people journeying to new locations. Many will need to buy new appliances, carpets, drapes and other furnishings for their new place. It will surely be a great shot in the arm for the economy and there are predictions that improving consumer confidence will fuel even more economic improvement! But hold on. Before we get to feeling all warm and fuzzy let’s remember that these are exactly the times con-men crave. When people are on the move and spending money the craftiest of that breed surfaces. [caption id="attachment_6294" align="alignright" width="150"] Do Your Movers Know What They're Doing?[/caption] Apparently, Spring is a traditional time when many decide to pick up and start fresh somewhere new. In fact, the month of May is National Moving Month and crooks have already marked it on their calendar. The AMSA has now joined forces with the national Better Business Bureau to remind anyone planning to move to beware of rip-off artists on the prowl. "A con artist with just a truck and a website can claim to be a legitimate mover with unfortunate results for consumers who don’t check out a company in advance,” warns AMSA President and CEO Linda Bauer Darr. The BBB reports that last year 1.3 million Americans were smart enough to call their local offices to check out moving companies before they hired them. Unfortunately, lots of others did not, relying on a “friend of a friend” or an ad on Craigslist to find what they thought would be a reputable moving company. The Bureau says it also got more than 9,000 complaints about unscrupulous movers in 2012. [caption id="attachment_6303" align="alignleft" width="150"] Check Out Movers with the BBB first[/caption] Among the issues: unskilled workers who didn't pack things properly, damaged, destroyed or missing items, late deliveries and original estimates that suddenly ballooned once the truck pulled up to the new residence. Many consumers reported their belongings were, literally, held hostage until the disputed amount was paid in full. Case in point: a man named Tim Walker, who moved from Virginia to Nevada and after six weeks of fighting finally gave in. He paid double the original estimate to get his belongings released. Sometimes dishonest movers can be found and punished but lots of times they – their truck and their attractive web site – disappear without a trace. So, what’s a harried family pre-occupied with packing up supposed to do to protect themselves? [caption id="attachment_6297" align="alignright" width="150"] Don't Forget About Cluttered Attics & Garages[/caption] First, get at least three in-house written estimates and when you call note whether they answer with their business name or just a drowsy sounding, “Hello?” So that your estimate is based in reality make sure the company sees everything you want to take including all the stuff you’ve stashed in the garage. Verify that the mover is actually insured and bonded as so many claim to be. And, don’t jump at the lowest price thinking you’re getting a deal. Remember the old saying, “You get what you pay for.” Second, if you are moving out of state understand that all interstate movers have to be licensed with the federal government so ask for the company’s motor carrier number. Then, go to www.protectyourmove.gov and make sure to verify that the number is active. Third, know your rights. In fact, reputable movers will give you pamphlets outlining ways to make sure the transport of your belongings goes smoothly. Never pay hostage money for your property. Call police right away if movers demand more money than their original estimate. Several states are conducting undercover stings of suspected rogue movers this season so the faster you can get law enforcement on the scene the better. For good measure, don’t forget to report the crooks to the BBB. [caption id="attachment_6304" align="alignleft" width="150"] This Symbol Can Help You Decide[/caption] The American Moving & Storage Association also helps make your final choice of an honest mover easier. They have a sort of Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval you should look for. They bestow their stylized blue “M” ProMovers logo only on certified moving companies. Once you see that logo on a company’s advertisements or business card you can be sure the firm has gone through the association’s rigorous screening program which includes a criminal background check on all owners, officers and stockholders. The firm must show they are in compliance with all state and federal laws. The company has to agree not to engage in false advertising and they sign the association’s Code of Ethics pledge. Each year the AMSA doubles back to re-check each firm and their right to advertise with the ProMover designation can be revoked if they find any problems. “Our mission is to get these rogues off the road,” Darr says. “That is the single most important thing we can do … (They) are killing our business and killing consumers' faith in professional movers." You may not be changing your residence anytime soon but with close to 40 million Americans moving this year chances are you know someone who will be. Do them a favor. Warn them about the pitfalls. Hand them a copy of this column. home  

{ 11 comments }

Radical Muslims Want Us Dead – Understand?

by Diane Dimond on April 29, 2013

[caption id="attachment_6274" align="alignleft" width="150"] Tsarnaev Brothers - Radical Muslims Who Spread Terror[/caption] Extreme factions of the Muslim religion want us dead - every American and everyone who embraces a religion different than theirs. We are infidels, heathens and heretics and they believe it is their mission to wipe us off the face of the earth. I know it isn’t politically correct to publicly discuss how the most radicalized elements of the Muslim faith have targeted Americans for death. I know it is not acceptable to “profile” people based on their country of origin or religious traditions – not even when cold, hard, bloody, murderous facts directly stare us in the face. What kind of Alice-in-Wonderland thinking keeps this country from stating the obvious? What is the matter with us, as a people, that we cannot readily see and say who our enemy is? Now, before I’m waved off as suffering from Islamophobia let’s take a look at the two basic types of terror we face today. [caption id="attachment_6275" align="alignright" width="120"] Homegrown Source of Terror, Adam Lanza[/caption] The first kind is homegrown and we've suffered through a lot of it lately. It erupts when deranged people get a hold of a weapon and start destroying lives in our elementary schools, theaters and on college campuses. These are the random mass murders that evolve from the profound mental illness of our fellow citizens. I've written extensively in this space about the need to identify and help treat that group in advance of their deadly sprees. The second kind of terror is more insidious. It is carefully and meticulously planned. It springs from a fanatical religious place few of us can really understand. It is uniquely anti-American and while its perpetrators wrap themselves in a cloak of godliness their actions are a bona fide war, a cherished duty of jihad against people they don’t even know – us. [caption id="attachment_6277" align="alignleft" width="150"] Never Forget - Muslim Extremists Did This[/caption] Radicalized off-shoot cults of Islam twice attacked the World Trade Center (in 1993 and again in 2001) and forced down packed passenger jets at the Pentagon and a field in Pennsylvania. One enraged Muslim flexing his jihadist muscles used U.S. military issued weapons at Ft. Hood, Texas to gun down 13 Americans and wound 32 others. And now, the two profoundly misguided Muslim brother- bombers in Boston. All were murderous assassins who did not target a particular person. They put a bull’s-eye on any and all U.S. citizens – men, women and children of any age – and their goal was to kill and spill as much American blood as possible. In the midst of their rampage around Boston the Tsarnaev brothers car-jacked a luxury SUV and bragged to the Chinese driver about placing pressure cooker bombs at the marathon’s finish line. Later the victim told police the terrorists allowed him to live because, “I am not American.” That says it all. [caption id="attachment_6278" align="alignright" width="150"] Ambsr Stevens Dragged in Streets by Muslim Radicals[/caption] The terror filled week that played out in Boston grabbed many of us by our collective throat and slammed us against the wall because we had become complacent. We believed it couldn't happen again on American soil. Even in the face of attacks on American embassies overseas (and the still un-avenged torture and assassination of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens in Benghazi) we have swallowed pronouncements from Washington that “al-Qaeda is on its heels,” that the terrorist organization is nearly “decapitated” to use the president’s word. That, of course, is nonsense given what happened in Massachusetts last week. There is also an unconfirmed report from a British newspaper that the FBI is searching for a 12 member sleeper cell linked to the Boston bombers – a cell that, “has been waiting several years for their day to come,” according to a source close to the investigation. And this week, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police announced the arrest of two “al-Qaeda inspired” suspects bent on de-railing a passenger train as it crossed a suspended trestle in Toronto. According to CBC News the pair had been under surveillance for more than a year and was getting their marching orders from an al-Qaeda operative living on the Afghanistan/Iran border. The RCMP now admits they have been monitoring a broad network of terrorism suspects in their country. [caption id="attachment_6279" align="alignleft" width="150"] Americans in Boston Celebrate Capture of Tsarnaev Brother[/caption] Taken together it seems clear that radical Muslim elements have a toe-hold right here in North America. They are not radical Catholics or extremist Methodists or fanatical Quakers. The terrorists who fervently want us dead are a splinter group of Muslims that hate Americans so much they will spend years silently organizing and plotting our demise and not care if they die in the process. This is not a column to condemn or place under suspicion the millions of compassionate, forgiving and loving Muslims in the world. I know that at the core of their belief is love and a toleration of all people and ideologies. But honest folk must agree that festering within the peace loving Muslim religion is a rotten core of murderous terrorists. It is clear that Muslim leaders are unable to police the flock. It is certain that Muslim dominated countries that get multiple billions in U.S. foreign aid – Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Iraq – aren’t helping eliminate the threat either. That leaves it up to us to fight our own battle against terrorism. How is that supposed to work if we cannot openly discuss the enemy without fear of being branded as prejudiced? It is not an act of discrimination to mention who they are. These violent Muslims have been out to destroy us for decades. So, cling to your political correctness if you must. I will adhere to the wise old saying, “Those who don’t know history are doomed to repeat it.” home  

{ 33 comments }

[caption id="attachment_6241" align="alignleft" width="150"] This is What Anti-AmericanTerror Looks Like[/caption]         "Make no mistake we will get to the bottom of this and we will find out who did this and find out why they did this."-- President Barak Obama There will be no satisfying “why” at the end of the investigation into who placed bombs near the finish line of the Boston marathon. Just like there was no satisfying “why” following the massacres at Columbine High School or Virginia Tech. Nothing can ever adequately explain to normal thinking people how a gunman could hunt down tiny students at a Connecticut elementary school or exterminate innocents gathered at a Tucson parking lot to see their Congresswoman, Gabby Giffords. And so it will go with Boston. [caption id="attachment_6243" align="alignright" width="150"] Two Brothers - One (Left) is Dead the Other Captured[/caption] We quickly learned the identity of the persons who chose Massachusetts’ Patriot’s Day to make their treasonous statement about whatever perceived wrong had festered in their sick mind.  And, even in these early days of the investigation we already knew a lot about their personalities. These  bombers wanted to inflict as much death and destruction as they possibly could. And, by timing the bombs as they did – setting them to explode during the fourth hour of the marathon – they weren't targeting the premiere athletes who had finished an hour or more earlier. No, the demented mastermind of this event wanted to exact revenge on the less strong, the average runner, who would be struggling the hardest to make it across the finish line. Was the perpetrator trying to send a twisted message against America or was it just a depraved attempt to deny the exhausted runners the joy of reaching their goal? Not long after the dual bombings President Obama solemnly announced, “Any responsible individuals, any responsible groups will feel the full weight of justice.” [caption id="attachment_6246" align="alignleft" width="150"] So Many Victims Lost Legs in the Blast[/caption] Well, here’s a question. Given all the sequestration-caused furloughs within the ranks of federal investigators and prosecutors who exactly will provide the “weight” behind this promised justice? Our federal law enforcement forces are already stretched to the limit and their massive workloads and mandatory furlough days aren't going to suddenly disappear because there is a new case on the books. Someone who is on the front line of all this (and therefore must remain confidential) wrote me after the tragedy to express total frustration. “Myself and all ‘Feds’ feel like we are getting beaten down so bad we can barely breathe. No raises for years, no future raises and now a massive reduction in salary through sequester furloughs [mandatory unpaid leave, during which we are NOT PERMITTED TO WORK or even answer our cell or emails!!]” This is the weighty justice system our president promises will leap into action? [caption id="attachment_6247" align="alignright" width="150"] AG Holder Warned of Sequestration Layoffs[/caption] Just last month my confidential source’s boss, Attorney General Eric Holder, told the Senate Judiciary Committee that the $1.6 billion dollar sequestration cut to the Justice Department’s budget could have a “profound” impact on America’s safety in the future. “Important law enforcement and litigation programs are being disrupted,” Holder said. “Our capacity - to respond to crimes, investigate wrongdoing, and hold criminals accountable - has been reduced.” Well, now the Justice Department has on its plate what will surely turn out to be a major and lengthy investigation into the Boston bombings. In addition, agents are being diverted with distracting events like the toxic ricin-laced letters sent to both the President and Senator Roger Wicker by a suspect in Mississippi. After several reports of suspicious packages at the U.S. Capitol Secret Service agents were called to supervise evacuations. In the New York metro area, there were dozens of citizen reports responding to the “If you see something, say something” command. The feds are surely monitoring those as well. [caption id="attachment_6250" align="alignleft" width="150"] The Anti-U.S. Terrorism Threat is Not Over[/caption] With depleted federal law enforcement ranks and morale about as low as it can go, what kind of progress can citizens expect on these investigations and prosecutions? And, here’s an even more ominous question posed by my confidential federal source. “Did someone who was on furlough, or perhaps even worse, who's morale is so devastated that s/he can no longer even focus on the mission, miss something? What if the dramatic reduction in resources and morale had an impact on the government's inability to prevent this horrible event??” That got me thinking. Did the CIA miss telephone or internet chatter that could have tipped us off to the bombings? If the FBI’s Boston office had all agents on full-time duty might they have been able to sniff out this deadly plot? Will the federal prosecutor who gets this case have enough resources to do an adequate job? [caption id="attachment_6252" align="alignright" width="150"] Let's Cut Federal Spending - But Wisely![/caption] On March 1st, when the mandatory 2% across-the-board federal budget cuts went into effect, I remember thinking, “Good! Make the federal government economize just like my family has to!” Now, I’m back to wishing that our elected officials in Congress and the White House could get it together long enough to figure out a way to cut the truly unnecessary spending within our bloated budget. The first mission of the federal government is supposed to be to insure our national defense. It doesn't make sense to cut law enforcement’s funding while bankrolling pie-in-the sky foreign aid programs like the $30 million spent on a program to spur mango production in Pakistan or the $207 million the Defense Department spent on a duplicative second engine design for the F-35 fighter. There is no denying there is evil in the world. There always has been and there always will be and civilized societies need to be able to forcefully fight against it. Those who brazenly plant bombs to kill innocent people are terrorists – plain and simple. Terrorists – homegrown or foreign born – deserve only one thing: swift and decisive punishment, nothing more and nothing less. I fear America is not in the best position to deliver that. home  

{ 19 comments }

Is Your Stoplight Watching You?

April 15, 2013

[caption id="attachment_6207" align="alignleft" width="150"] Traffic Camera Are Everywhere[/caption] I didn’t realize I had broken the law until I opened an official envelope with a traffic ticket inside. Each time this has happened I’ve thought, “Darn those traffic cameras!” Okay, I likely said something spicier than that because there’s little else to say in one’s defense when confronted with photographic [...]

Read the full article →